Safety review requirements and processes for medical devices in China's NMPA certification
分类:行业新闻 发布时间:2025-01-06 17:45:46
The safety review is an essential part of the NMPA certification process for medical devices in China. It ensures that devices meet stringent safety standards before being approved for sale. Manufacturers must provide comprehensive documentation, undergo rigorous testing, and implement systems to monitor the device’s safety post-market. Adhering to these safety requirements not only helps secure NMPA approval but also protects public health by ensuring the safe use of medical devices.

In China, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) oversees the certification of medical devices, ensuring that these products meet safety, quality, and efficacy standards. A crucial part of the NMPA registration process is the safety review of medical devices. This review evaluates the potential risks posed by the device to patients, operators, and the environment, ensuring the device is safe for use.

Key Elements of Safety Review for NMPA Certification

  1. Safety Risk Assessment:

    • A comprehensive safety risk assessment must be conducted to identify, analyze, and evaluate the potential risks associated with the medical device. This includes electrical, mechanical, chemical, and biological hazards.
    • The manufacturer must demonstrate how the risks are mitigated or minimized through design, manufacturing controls, and labeling.
    • Risk analysis should be based on international standards such as ISO 14971 (risk management for medical devices).
  2. Device Classification:

    • The NMPA classifies medical devices into three categories: Class I, Class II, and Class III. The level of review required for safety depends on the classification:
      • Class I devices have lower risk and typically undergo a simplified review process.
      • Class II and III devices, which carry a higher risk to patients or operators, require more detailed safety reviews, including clinical trials and additional documentation.
  3. Preclinical Testing and Performance Data:

    • Manufacturers must submit preclinical test reports, including biocompatibility (ISO 10993), sterility, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), and safety performance tests. These tests are critical for demonstrating the safety of the device in its intended use.
    • For certain high-risk devices, clinical trials may be required to collect data on the device’s safety and performance in a real-world clinical setting.
  4. Labeling and Instructions for Use (IFU):

    • The labeling and Instructions for Use (IFU) must be reviewed to ensure they provide adequate information about the device’s safe use, including warnings, contraindications, and instructions for proper handling, storage, and disposal.
    • The information must be clear, comprehensive, and compliant with NMPA regulations, including language and format requirements.
  5. Manufacturing and Quality Control:

    • NMPA requires evidence that the manufacturer has a robust quality management system in place (often ISO 13485 certification) to ensure that the device is produced in compliance with safety standards.
    • During the review process, the NMPA may inspect the manufacturing facilities and verify that safety procedures are followed during production.
  6. Post-Market Surveillance Plan:

    • A post-market surveillance (PMS) plan must be submitted, demonstrating that the manufacturer has mechanisms in place to monitor the device’s safety once it is marketed. This includes handling adverse event reporting, complaints, recalls, and device defect management.
    • The manufacturer is required to conduct ongoing evaluations of the device’s safety performance based on post-market data.
  7. Specific Safety Standards and Guidelines:

    • NMPA safety reviews may reference a range of Chinese National Standards (GB standards) and International Standards (ISO, IEC, etc.) relevant to the type of medical device. For instance:
      • GB 9706.1 for general requirements for medical electrical equipment.
      • GB/T 14233 for the biological evaluation of medical devices.
      • IEC 60601-1 for safety requirements for medical electrical equipment.
  8. Special Considerations for High-Risk Devices:

    • For Class III devices (e.g., implants, life-supporting devices), NMPA will require additional safety documentation, including clinical trial data and long-term safety evaluations.
    • High-risk devices may also require specialized safety testing for device failures or hazards that could directly threaten patient health, such as battery failure in powered devices or electrical malfunctions in life-supporting equipment.

The Safety Review Process

  1. Pre-Submission Preparation:

    • The manufacturer prepares all required documents, including:
      • Safety risk assessments, performance data, preclinical testing results, and quality management certifications.
      • A comprehensive safety and effectiveness dossier.
  2. Submission to NMPA:

    • The complete application package, including the safety review documents, is submitted to the NMPA for review. The NMPA evaluates the application based on device classification and associated risks.
  3. Review by Expert Panels:

    • For higher-risk devices (Classes II and III), NMPA may convene an expert panel to review the safety data and assess compliance with the applicable standards.
    • The panel evaluates the results of the risk assessment, preclinical testing, and performance data, ensuring that all potential safety concerns are addressed.
  4. Safety Evaluation and Decision:

    • If the NMPA is satisfied with the safety information provided, they will approve the device for registration and grant marketing authorization.
    • If additional information is needed, NMPA may request modifications or additional tests. Manufacturers must address these concerns and resubmit the application.
  5. Post-Approval Monitoring:

    • Once the device is approved, the manufacturer must continue to monitor the device’s safety throughout its lifecycle. This includes adhering to post-market surveillance requirements and promptly reporting any adverse events.

Key Documents for Safety Review:

  • Risk management report based on ISO 14971.
  • Preclinical safety data, including biocompatibility, sterilization, and EMC testing.
  • Performance test reports (including electrical safety, functional performance, etc.).
  • Clinical trial data, if required.
  • Manufacturing quality system certificates, such as ISO 13485.
  • Post-market surveillance plan.

Conclusion:

The safety review is an essential part of the NMPA certification process for medical devices in China. It ensures that devices meet stringent safety standards before being approved for sale. Manufacturers must provide comprehensive documentation, undergo rigorous testing, and implement systems to monitor the device’s safety post-market. Adhering to these safety requirements not only helps secure NMPA approval but also protects public health by ensuring the safe use of medical devices.

Contact Us:

Whatsapp or Wechat:+86 15816864648;email address:hito.lin@grzan.cn

1.jpg