Safety standards and compliance assessment of NMPA certified medical devices in China
分类:公司新闻 发布时间:2024-12-20 16:51:01
The safety standards and compliance assessment process for NMPA-certified medical devices in China is robust and multi-faceted, ensuring that devices meet both Chinese and international standards for safety and performance. Manufacturers must adhere to detailed technical and regulatory requirements, including product testing, clinical evaluations, and compliance with GMP. Ongoing post-market surveillance ensures that any issues related to safety or performance are addressed promptly. This rigorous process helps ensure the safety of medical devices used in China and builds public trust in the healthcare system.

In China, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) oversees the safety standards and compliance assessment for medical devices through a stringent regulatory framework. This framework ensures that medical devices entering the Chinese market meet the required safety, efficacy, and quality standards to protect patient health and public safety. Below is a comprehensive overview of the safety standards and compliance assessment process for NMPA-certified medical devices.

1. Safety Standards for NMPA-Certified Medical Devices

The NMPA applies both national standards (GB standards) and international standards to ensure that medical devices meet safety and performance requirements. These standards cover multiple aspects of device design, manufacturing, and post-market performance.

Key Safety Standards and Guidelines:

  1. GB Standards (National Standards of China)

    • GB 9706.1: This is the general safety standard for medical electrical equipment, focusing on the safety of electrical devices. It sets requirements for protection against electrical shock, fire, mechanical hazards, and thermal hazards.
    • GB 15810: This standard relates to the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of medical devices, ensuring that devices do not emit harmful electromagnetic interference and can function properly in environments with other electronic equipment.
    • GB/T 16886.1: This standard pertains to the biological evaluation of medical devices, aligned with ISO 10993. It evaluates the biocompatibility of devices that come into contact with human tissue, including tests for cytotoxicity, irritation, and sensitization.
    • GB 18455: Focuses on safety requirements for implants and devices that interact with tissues, ensuring the safety of devices that come into prolonged contact with the human body.
  2. International Standards:

    • ISO 13485: This standard specifies requirements for a quality management system (QMS) in medical device manufacturing. It covers aspects such as risk management, documentation, and design controls.
    • ISO 14971: Pertains to risk management for medical devices, helping manufacturers identify, evaluate, and control risks associated with device use.
    • IEC 60601-1: A key international standard for the safety of medical electrical equipment, which covers electrical hazards, mechanical hazards, and other safety concerns for electrically powered medical devices.
    • ISO 10993: This standard is used for biocompatibility testing of medical devices that come into contact with the human body. It sets guidelines for assessing the potential biological risk of materials used in medical devices.
  3. Specific Device Standards:

    • Depending on the type of medical device, there are device-specific safety standards such as those for implants, diagnostic devices, surgical instruments, and personal protective equipment (PPE). For example:
      • ISO 11135 for ethylene oxide sterilization.
      • ISO 17665 for steam sterilization.
      • ISO 14937 for radiation sterilization.

    These standards ensure that the device is safe for its intended use and does not pose undue risk to patients, healthcare providers, or the environment.

2. Compliance Assessment for NMPA-Certified Medical Devices

The NMPA’s compliance assessment process evaluates whether a medical device meets the required safety standards and regulatory requirements. This process involves a pre-market evaluation of the device’s safety and effectiveness and post-market monitoring to ensure ongoing compliance.

Pre-market Compliance Assessment:

  1. Technical Documentation:

    • Manufacturers are required to submit detailed technical documentation demonstrating compliance with relevant safety and performance standards. This includes:
      • Design and manufacturing processes.
      • Risk analysis and management reports.
      • Clinical trial data (if applicable).
      • Test reports showing compliance with national and international standards (e.g., EMC, electrical safety, biocompatibility, etc.).
  2. Product Testing:

    • The NMPA may require testing of the medical device against relevant safety standards, such as:
      • Electrical safety tests (e.g., leakage current, grounding resistance, etc.).
      • Biocompatibility tests (e.g., cytotoxicity, irritation, sensitization, etc.).
      • Sterilization validation (if applicable).
      • Performance testing to ensure that the device meets the specifications outlined by the manufacturer and the regulatory requirements.
  3. Clinical Evaluation:

    • For higher-risk devices (especially Class II and Class III), the NMPA requires clinical data to demonstrate the device's safety and effectiveness in real-world conditions. This could involve:
      • Clinical trials: Conducted in China or based on data from international studies (if accepted by the NMPA).
      • Clinical evaluation reports: Analyzing available clinical evidence, including published literature or data from similar devices.
  4. Manufacturing Facility Inspections:

    • The NMPA may conduct Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) inspections of the manufacturing facility, particularly for higher-risk devices. The facility must comply with GMP regulations, which cover:
      • Quality control systems.
      • Documentation and record-keeping.
      • Production processes to ensure device consistency and quality.
    • This is typically required for Class II and Class III devices but may also be conducted on Class I devices in some cases.
  5. Clinical Trial Waivers:

    • In some cases, the NMPA may waive the requirement for clinical trials if sufficient clinical data or evidence from a similar product can be provided. The agency also considers foreign clinical data from international markets like the EU, the U.S., or Japan, though it may request additional information specific to the Chinese population.

Post-market Compliance Assessment:

  1. Post-market Surveillance (PMS):

    • Once the device is on the market, the manufacturer must establish a post-market surveillance system to monitor the device’s performance and safety in real-world use. This includes:
      • Adverse event reporting: Manufacturers must promptly report any adverse events or safety issues that occur after the device is marketed in China.
      • Corrective and preventive actions (CAPA): If safety issues are identified, the manufacturer must take corrective actions to address the issue and prevent recurrence.
  2. Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR):

    • For high-risk devices, the manufacturer may be required to submit periodic safety update reports (PSURs) to the NMPA, summarizing the safety and performance data gathered after the device has been marketed.
  3. Inspection and Audits:

    • The NMPA may conduct unannounced inspections of manufacturing facilities and market surveillance to ensure ongoing compliance with safety standards.
    • Random sampling of devices may occur at importation points or in retail settings to verify compliance.
  4. Recalls:

    • If a device is found to pose a risk to patient safety after market launch, the NMPA has the authority to order a recall. Manufacturers are required to cooperate fully with NMPA’s investigation and recall process.

3. Regulatory Requirements for Different Device Classes:

  • Class I Devices: These devices have lower risk, and the NMPA generally allows self-declaration of compliance. However, even Class I devices must meet basic safety requirements and undergo random inspections.
  • Class II Devices: Manufacturers must provide more detailed documentation, including clinical data or risk assessments. The NMPA will conduct a comprehensive review of the device's safety and effectiveness.
  • Class III Devices: These devices, which pose the highest risk, must undergo the most thorough compliance assessment, including clinical trials, extensive product testing, and facility inspections.

Conclusion

The safety standards and compliance assessment process for NMPA-certified medical devices in China is robust and multi-faceted, ensuring that devices meet both Chinese and international standards for safety and performance. Manufacturers must adhere to detailed technical and regulatory requirements, including product testing, clinical evaluations, and compliance with GMP. Ongoing post-market surveillance ensures that any issues related to safety or performance are addressed promptly. This rigorous process helps ensure the safety of medical devices used in China and builds public trust in the healthcare system.

Contact Us:

Whatsapp or Wechat:+86 15816864648;email address:hito.lin@grzan.cn

1(8).jpg